Attorney General says: President’s term covers six years
The incumbent President who was elected on January 8, 2015 had assumed duties in the office of President on January 9, 2015 for a period of six years. Any changes of the term of President would be an alienation of the sovereignty of the people, Attorney General President’s Counsel Jayantha Jayasuriya said.
“There is no provisions in the 19th Amendment to operate same with retrospective effect. Constitutions cannot be amended with retrospective effect,” the Attorney General said making submissions on a determination sought by President Maithripala Sirisena from the Supreme Court as regards the duration of the term of his presidency.
The Supreme Court yesterday concluded arguments put forward in support and against the reference application forwarded by President Sirisena seeking an opinion whether it is constitutional for him to serve for a period of six years in the office of President and all parties in the application were directed to file their written submissions by today (12).
Later on, the Supreme Court’s determination over the reference application is to be communicated to the President before January 14.
Attorney General Jayantha Jayasuriya PC yesterday informed the Supreme Court that people had exercised their sovereignty through the right of franchise to elect President Maithripala Sirisena to the office of President for a period of six years prior to the operation of 19th Amendment to the Constitution.
He submitted that the incumbent President was elected by the people for the office to the term of 6 years. It is the sovereignty of the people who exercise their franchise to elect him as President. The power emanated from the franchise of the people. The commencement of his office should be considered from the date on which he is elected.
He said it is the Constitutional structure where the incumbent President was elected. The 19th Amendment to the Constitution is operative after the incumbent President was elected for a term of 6 years by the people.
He continued that therefore the issue is whether the Article 3 and 4 of the 19th Amendment made operative where the term of office has already commenced.
Meanwhile, President’s Counsel Manohara de Silva appearing for an intervenient petitioner informed the Supreme Court that President’s term should be confined to five years in accordance with the 19th Amendment to the constitution. “The President in his website also insisted that he would like to limit his term of office. He agreed to have it for five years,” Counsel stated.
Seven intervenient petitioners filed their papers and made oral submissions regarding the President’s reference.
President’s Counsel Saliya Peiris, Manohara de Silva PC, Ali Sabry PC, Faiz Musthapha PC, Senior Counsel Kalyananda Thiraanagama, Senior Court Chrismal Warnasuriya appeared for the intervenient petitioners.
The court said it will convey its decision to President Maithripala Sirisena.
Meanwhile the President’s Media Division, issuing a statement, said that two different views have been expressed in legal, civil and political circles about the duration of the term of Presidency after the enactment of the 19th Amendment to the Constitution.
“In order to dispel this confusion, the President has sought the opinion of the Supreme Court regarding the actual term of office.”
According to the powers vested on the President under the Constitution, the President has the right to seek the opinion of the Supreme Court, it said, adding, that the former Presidents who held office had also sought the opinion of the Supreme Court during their tenures.
President invoked the Consultative jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under article 129. (1) If at any time it appears to the President of the Republic that a question of law or fact has arisen or is likely to arise which is of such nature and of such public importance that it is expedient to obtain the opinion of the Supreme Court upon it, he may refer that question to that Court for consideration and the Court may, after such hearing as it thinks fit, within the period specified in such reference or within such time as may be extended by the President, report to the President its opinion thereon.
(Government News Portal)
Latest Headlines in Sri Lanka
- Sri Lanka and United States discuss Economic Support and Reforms April 19, 2024
- Israeli missile strikes Iran amid escalating Middle East tensions April 19, 2024
- President says he will build a Sri Lanka that the youth aspire to April 19, 2024
- NPP presents 7-point pledge on Easter Sunday Attack to Cardinal Ranjith April 18, 2024
- Dialog Axiata to acquire Bharti Airtel’s telecom operations in Sri Lanka April 18, 2024
The attorney general should go by the written constitution and its interpretation. The conflict arises as consequence of stream of amendments to the clause and when an amendment is invoked then the preceding clause should be expunged from the consititution and this should be e and a fotnote be added so that there is no contradictions.
As for the Constitutional reform is a dynamic proces and it is the resposibility of the judiciary to report on conflicts and contradictions and report it to the parliament tot table for debate and resolve these conflicts and contrdictions trough amendments.
Tis isdea of soevregnity of the people is preposterous. The constitution dictates as to when the frequency of p[residential and all other elections. If the presidential elections are scheduled every five years and the gestation of president is 6 years then there is a serious flaw in the Constitution and the extension of the presidential term could be determined by the will of the people through rferendum if the constitution provides for such a mechanism
AG is guided by the constition and it is the responsibility of the AG to prosecute those in high offices who violate the constitution. But if the AG works in collusion with the government then there is a serious problem with the deocartic process.
But he said he is standing only for 4 years.
Ooooooooooooooooooooooooo!
No worries, my dear SL Citizens.
We are a model ‘SHITHOLE’ country (as per Trump definition) after 69 years of pure Sinhala Buddhist rule.
Guys, did you see the clowns and idiots of the Sinhala Buddhist leadership in action in the Parliament, a couple of days age?
Well, we are truly SHITHOLE, my dear friends.
Thuleepan Somasundaram your mouth is our SH*TH*LE.