Sri Lankans protest ruling against chief justice
AP – By Bharatha Mallawarachi – Pix by Reuters
COLOMBO: Hundreds of Sri Lankans hit the streets Monday to protest against a parliamentary committee that ruled the country’s chief justice is unfit to hold office because of unexplained wealth and misuse of power.
Opposition lawmakers, lawyers and rights activists joined the protest in the capital Colombo, demanding that the government halt an impeachment process against Chief Justice Shirani Bandaranayake.
The committee announced Saturday that after investigating five of the 14 charges against Bandaranayake, it found she was guilty of three of them. Bandaranayake has denied all the allegations.
The ruling came after Bandaranayake and four opposition party members, who were part of the committee, walked out of the hearing, saying they had no faith in the fairness of the process. The other seven members of the committee come from the ruling party of President Mahinda Rajapaksa.
The protesters shouted slogans and displayed placards that read “Restore sovereignty of judiciary “and “Let’s rise against this era of anarchy.”
Trade unionist Saman Rathnapriya said the government had to withdraw the impeachment motion to “restore independence of judiciary and country’s democracy.”
Opposition lawmaker Tissa Attanayake said the impeachment motion was part of “the government’s efforts to control the judiciary.”
The committee said Bandaranayke had failed to declare 20 bank accounts, and had purchased a house on behalf of another person and then taken judicial control of several cases filed against the company that sold the property.
She was also found to have a conflict of interest because she has supervisory power over judges who are hearing a corruption case against her husband, a former state bank chairman.
Anura Yapa, a government lawmaker, who headed the impeachment committee, told reporters Saturday that Bandaranayke was found guilty of offenses “that warrant her removal from office.”
The committee’s report will be put to a vote when parliament reconvenes early next year. The result then goes to the president, who has the power to dismiss or retain the chief justice.
Besides criticism from Sri Lanka’s legal community, the impeachment process has also drawn international concern, including from the United States.
Opposition lawmakers said the committee was not fair because the seven ruling-party members did not allow what they said were reasonable requests for establishing a procedure for the hearing or allow Bandaranayake access to a list of witnesses and a chance to cross examine them.
They said the committee gave Bandaranayake and her lawyers fewer than 24 hours to study 300 documents and prepare for her defense.
Lawyers and the opposition say the impeachment is an effort to undermine judicial independence and give more power to Rajapaksa, who effectively controls the 225-member Parliament with two-thirds of its members on his side.
Bandaranayake was appointed by Rajapaksa as the country’s first female chief justice. She started drawing criticism from the government after she ruled that a law that gave vast powers to the economic development minister, the president’s younger brother, was unconstitutional.
- Sri Lanka’s Central Bank warns general public over 8 pyramid-type schemes May 31, 2023
- Sri Lankan Rupee appreciates against U.S. Dollar May 31, 2023
- Chinese reaffirms support for Sri Lanka’s economic recovery May 31, 2023
- Sri Lanka’s Central Bank to hold rates as inflation stays high May 31, 2023
- Sri Lanka to initiate new online passport application system May 30, 2023
- India extends USD 1 Billion Credit Line for Sri Lanka until March 2024 May 30, 2023
- Cabinet approves resume of the Colombo Light Rail Transit project May 30, 2023
Who gave the constitutional OK to the 18th Amendment? Is it not the current CJ?
The opposition blundered when they walked out of the PSC. They should have participated, come what may, and expressed their opinions so that their views go into the records. What is said at Lipton Circus does not go into records.
The people of Sri Lanka have granted 2/3rds majority to the UPFA in Parliament. Using this mandate, the nation is being effectively driven towards “The Wonder of Asia” on Chinthana principles. The UPFA should use its majority to amend the constitution to change the frequency of Presidential elections to 12-15 years to enable stability in economic and social development.
I hesitate to agree with you, though I am grateful for our Hon President and his brother Hon Gotabhaya for ridding the country of the evil LTTE, because power in the long run can corrupt. Hence it is important to win the mandate of the nation every 5 years for the President to rule, and that the same man can contest term after term without limit, in order to bring about the necessary stability the country needs at the moment to progress on the super highway. Once he has achieved this stability let a younger man continue the good work of building the ONE NATION to greater strength, free of being under the yoke of India or the imperial West.
As a lawyer Mr.Nimal Siripala De silva was appointed as an investigator to findout wrongdoings of CJ. Mr.President did not investigate wrongdoings of Mr.Nimal Siripala De Silva, when he imported expired medicine to Sri Lanka. How many small children died after the Rubella vaccinations. Not only him, all the parliamentarians are fully corrupted. I can challenge them to come forward for a vedio conference and I will ask them all the questions and show them what they have done under the umbrella of Mr.President of Sri Lanka.
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Thank you Mr Dias, for that semblance of agreement with my views. I am serious when I proposed a presidential term of 12-15 years.