SC rules five sections of Right to Information Bill inconsistent with Constitution
Speaker Karu Jayasuriya yesterday informed the House that the Supreme Court had informed him that five sections of the Right to Information Bill were inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution and a two thirds majority of Parliament was needed for the approval of the bill.
Reading out the Supreme Court ruling, he said the Section 5(1) A of the bill was inconsistent with Sections 3,4,12 (1) and 14 (a) 1 of the Constitution.
The Supreme Court has decided that Sections 9 (2) A, 19, 43 (a) and 43 (o) of the bill are inconsistent with the Sections 3, 4, 12 (1), 14, and 55 of the Constitution.
Therefore, a special majority of two thirds votes was needed to pass the bill in its present form, the Speaker said.
However, the Supreme Court had permitted the passing of the Bill with a simple majority of the House if the sections inconsistent with the constitution were amended remove the inconsistencies, the Speaker said.
(Source: The Island – By Saman Indrajith)
Latest Headlines in Sri Lanka
- Police Inspector, Constable arrested over missing gun at Matugama Police Station February 2, 2026
- Sri Lanka allows women to work at night as sanitary and food service workers February 1, 2026
- India pledges INR 4 Billion aid to Sri Lanka in 2026-2027 Budget February 1, 2026
- Shiranthi Rajapaksa summoned to FCID on February 3, 2026 February 1, 2026
- Sri Lanka PM calls for education reform to strengthen nation February 1, 2026
