Several FR violation petitions filed challenging President’s decision to dissolve parliament

Sri Lanka Parliament and Supreme Court

Several Fundamental Rights (FR) petitions were filed at the Supreme Court, on Tuesday, challenging the decision of the President to dissolve Parliament, on March 2, and the decision by the Elections Commission to reschedule elections, on June 20, amidst the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.

Journalist Victor Ivan and Dr. Paikiasothy Saravanamuttu, Executive Director of the Centre for Policy Alternatives (CPA) are among the eight petitioners who filed the applications.

The petitions are expected to be taken up for hearing on May 11.

Petitioners stated that Articles 70 and 33(2)(c) of the Constitution permit the President to dissolve Parliament, prior to the completion of its five-year term, after the passage of four and a half years, from its first sitting. They claimed that the President used this power to dissolve the Eighth Parliament, on the 2nd of March 2020, by Gazette Extraordinary no. 2165/8, and fix the 25th of April 2020, as the date for election of the Ninth Parliament. This was despite the fact that COVID-19 was spreading across the world, and Sri Lanka, too, was taking steps to combat it.

The declaration of COVID-19, as a pandemic, and its rapid spread, resulted in the Election Commission making a decision to postpone the election. Thereafter, on 20th of April 2020, the Commission issued Gazette Extraordinary no. 2172/3, fixing the election for the 20th of June 2020.

The Gazette by which the Eighth Parliament was dissolved fixed the date for the first meeting of the Ninth Parliament for the 14th of May 2020. The Petitioners have stated that while the said Gazette remains in place, a new date for the election of the Ninth Parliament cannot be fixed beyond the 2nd June 2020.

“The Petitioners argued that regardless of how it is dissolved, Article 70(5) of the Constitution provides a mandatory time limit within which a new Parliament should meet, i.e. three months from the date of dissolution. The Petitioners state that if the 2nd March 2020 dissolution is permitted to stand, this would have required the new Parliament to meet for the first time by the 2nd June 2020. Thus, a decision to hold the election on the 20th of June 2020 is unconstitutional, and a violation of their fundamental rights,” CPA said.

The Petitioners have observed that it is impossible to hold a free and fair election in the context of the COVID-19 crisis. The health risk would seriously impede campaigning efforts and voter turnouts, which are essential for a free and fair election. Further, it would be difficult for election officers and voters to maintain social distancing during the election and the preparation for the same, which would increase the risk of the spread of the virus. As such there is likelihood that elections could be further postponed, beyond June 20.

The lack of a functioning Parliament, for more than three months, undermines the sovereignty of the people and undermines the rule of law. In light of all these circumstances, the Petitioners have requested the Supreme Court to declare that their fundamental rights, under Articles 12(1) and 14(1) (a) of the Constitution, have been violated.

(Source: The Island)

Share on FB